<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Practice Exam 2 — BattleActs Exam 8 Forum</title>
        <link>https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 23:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>Practice Exam 2 — BattleActs Exam 8 Forum</description>
    <atom:link href="https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/categories/practice-exam-2/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Q13</title>
        <link>https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/279/q13</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 12:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Practice Exam 2</category>
        <dc:creator>Lcparga1</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">279@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p><p>Wouldn't the loss elimination ratio for retrospective premiums be the excess ratio? And LDD plans would have the LER shown in the solutions?</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Q11</title>
        <link>https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/270/q11</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Practice Exam 2</category>
        <dc:creator>xlto22</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">270@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, for part c), will any credit be given for the stating that 'if one class plan does a better job of identifying VHM, while also adjusting and minimizing EPV, then that plan should assign higher credibility to the risk compared to the other'?</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Q5</title>
        <link>https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/269/q5</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Practice Exam 2</category>
        <dc:creator>xlto22</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">269@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>"Hi, regarding </p><p>part b) should the calculations in the solution stops at 9.1198 which I thought it's the "intercept term" asked in the question?</p><p>part c) will any credit be rewarded for stating "include the interaction term, and then assess p-value and std error ..."</p><p>part e) on 'full credibility of data,' would it be reasonable to argue in the direction of GLMM that there may be fewer electric vans, which could result in the predictor being not significant if there is a large number of cars or trucks?"</p><p>thank you in advance!</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>PE#2 #7</title>
        <link>https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/265/pe-2-7</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Practice Exam 2</category>
        <dc:creator>Ajshepar36</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">265@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Are the ILFs in the solution backwards? I agree that we always use the $100K base limit PO ILF row, but it seems like for 2022 we should use 1.630 to match the 500K agg limit for that year, and so on. Let me know if I am missing something here, thank you!</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>practice exam 2 - qs 19</title>
        <link>https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/263/practice-exam-2-qs-19</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 22:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Practice Exam 2</category>
        <dc:creator>Ayesha</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">263@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>answer to part c says:</p><p>"Franchise deductible will eliminate more small values nuisance claims than the straight deductible"</p><p>can you please explain why this is true?</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Practice Exam 2 - Qs 10c</title>
        <link>https://www.battleacts8.ca/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussion/261/practice-exam-2-qs-10c</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 02:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Practice Exam 2</category>
        <dc:creator>Ayesha</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">261@/8/forum/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>For part 10C, a bunch of audited premiums are provided. That's confusing. Don't we need payroll?</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
