Bahnemann.Chapter5: Difference between revisions

From BattleActs Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 94: Line 94:
Since insurers are mainly interested in claims which they have to pay out on, it's better to work with the variable, <math>X_A=X-A</math>,  which is defined on <math>A<X<\infty</math> and is called the <span style="color:red;">'''excess of X over the limit A'''</span>. This variable ignores claims less than or equal to ''A'' and reduces all others by amount ''A''. When a variable ''X'' is modified in this fashion, it is said to be <span style="color:red;">'''truncated from below and shifted by A'''</span>.
Since insurers are mainly interested in claims which they have to pay out on, it's better to work with the variable, <math>X_A=X-A</math>,  which is defined on <math>A<X<\infty</math> and is called the <span style="color:red;">'''excess of X over the limit A'''</span>. This variable ignores claims less than or equal to ''A'' and reduces all others by amount ''A''. When a variable ''X'' is modified in this fashion, it is said to be <span style="color:red;">'''truncated from below and shifted by A'''</span>.


Two formulas worth memorizing are:
Three formulas worth memorizing are:
* <math>F_{X_A}(x)=Pr(X-A\leq x \;|\; X>A) =\begin{cases}0 & \mbox{if } -\infty<x<0 \\ \frac{F_X(X+A)-F_X(A)}{1-F_X(A)} & \mbox{if }0\leq x<\infty\end{cases}</math>
* <math>F_{X_A}(x)=Pr(X-A\leq x \;|\; X>A) =\begin{cases}0 & \mbox{if } -\infty<x<0 \\ \frac{F_X(X+A)-F_X(A)}{1-F_X(A)} & \mbox{if }0\leq x<\infty\end{cases}</math>
* <math>E[X_A]=\frac{E[X]-E[X;A]}{1-F_X(A)}</math>
* <math>E[X_A]=\frac{E[X]-E[X;A]}{1-F_X(A)}</math>
* <math>E[X_A;L]=\frac{E[X:A+L]-E[X;A]}{1-F_X(A)}</math> for some limit <math>L\geq A</math>.


Bahnemann gives formulas for <math>E[X_A^2]</math> and <math>E[X_A^3]</math>. Since they're fairly complicated, it's likely you would be given them in the exam if needed.
Bahnemann gives formulas for <math>E[X_A^2]</math> and <math>E[X_A^3]</math>. Since they're fairly complicated, it's likely you would be given them in the exam if needed.
Since Pareto distributions are common in insurance applications, it's worth taking a look at Example 5.2 from the text.
:{|class="wikitable"
|-
|Example 5.2: Calculate <math>E[X_d]</math> for a Pareto claim size variable ''X''
|}
:<span style="color:red;"><u>Solution</u></span>
:The probability density function of a Pareto distribution is <math>f_X(x)=\frac{\alpha\beta^\alpha}{(x+\beta)^{\alpha+1}}</math>, <math>0<x<\infty</math>. The expected value, <math>E[X]</math> of a Pareto distribution is <math>E[x]=\frac{\beta}{\alpha-1}</math> and is defined whenever <math>\alpha>1</math>.
:Rather than calculating directly, let's make an observation. We have <math>f_{X_d}(x) = \frac{f_X(x+d)}{1-F_X(d)}=\frac{\alpha(d+\beta)^\alpha}{(x+d+\beta)^{\alpha+1}}</math>. This is itself a Pareto distribution with parameters &alpha;, <math>(d+\beta)</math>. Consequently, we immediately get <math>E[X_d]=\frac{d+\beta}{\alpha-1}</math>. Keeping an eye out for relations like this can save you a lot of time on the exam...
===Excess Severity===


===Layer of Coverage===
===Layer of Coverage===

Revision as of 01:08, 9 February 2020

Reading: Bahnemann, D., "Distributions for Actuaries", CAS Monograph #2, Chapter 5.

Synopsis: To follow...

Study Tips

...your insights... To follow...

Estimated study time: x mins, or y hrs, or n1-n2 days, or 1 week,... (not including subsequent review time)

BattleTable

Based on past exams, the main things you need to know (in rough order of importance) are:

  • fact A...
  • fact B...
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d)
E (2018.Spring #1)
E (2018.Spring #1)
E (2018.Spring #1)
E (2018.Spring #1)
E (2018.Spring #1)
E (2018.Spring #1)
E (2018.Spring #1)
E (2018.Spring #1)

In Plain English!

Chapters 1 through 4 aren't on the exam but are worth quickly reading if you have time. You don't need to worry about the proofs but it is a great introduction to the distributions you'll be using in chapters 5 and 6.

Overview of Excess Claims

All claims are restricted in size to at least as large as some fixed amount A > 0. We do not know anything directly about claims smaller than A as these would be paid at $0, so not reported to the insurer in general. A common example of this is a deductible, but other situations can occur such as when an insurer covers a non-primary layer of claims in the case of umbrella insurance.

Mathematically, if X is an unlimited claim size random variable, we define the random variable Y by [math]Y=\begin{cases}0 &\mbox{if }0\leq X\leq A \\ X-A & \mbox{if }A\lt X\lt \infty\end{cases}[/math].

The distribution Y reflects the claim size modified by the condition that the insurer pays nothing until claims reach a certain size, A.

The cumulative distribution function for Y is [math]F_Y(y)=Pr(Y\leq y)=\begin{cases}0 & \mbox{if } -\infty \lt y\lt 0 \\ F_X(y+A) & \mbox{if } 0\leq y\lt \infty\end{cases}[/math].

If [math]E[X][/math] exists then [math]E[Y][/math] does as well. We have [math]E[Y]=E[X]-E[X;A][/math], where [math]E[X;A][/math] is the expected value of X limited to A. Since this is a positive amount, we have [math]E[Y]\leq E[X][/math].

Since insurers are mainly interested in claims which they have to pay out on, it's better to work with the variable, [math]X_A=X-A[/math], which is defined on [math]A\lt X\lt \infty[/math] and is called the excess of X over the limit A. This variable ignores claims less than or equal to A and reduces all others by amount A. When a variable X is modified in this fashion, it is said to be truncated from below and shifted by A.

Three formulas worth memorizing are:

  • [math]F_{X_A}(x)=Pr(X-A\leq x \;|\; X\gt A) =\begin{cases}0 & \mbox{if } -\infty\lt x\lt 0 \\ \frac{F_X(X+A)-F_X(A)}{1-F_X(A)} & \mbox{if }0\leq x\lt \infty\end{cases}[/math]
  • [math]E[X_A]=\frac{E[X]-E[X;A]}{1-F_X(A)}[/math]
  • [math]E[X_A;L]=\frac{E[X:A+L]-E[X;A]}{1-F_X(A)}[/math] for some limit [math]L\geq A[/math].

Bahnemann gives formulas for [math]E[X_A^2][/math] and [math]E[X_A^3][/math]. Since they're fairly complicated, it's likely you would be given them in the exam if needed.

Since Pareto distributions are common in insurance applications, it's worth taking a look at Example 5.2 from the text.

Example 5.2: Calculate [math]E[X_d][/math] for a Pareto claim size variable X
Solution
The probability density function of a Pareto distribution is [math]f_X(x)=\frac{\alpha\beta^\alpha}{(x+\beta)^{\alpha+1}}[/math], [math]0\lt x\lt \infty[/math]. The expected value, [math]E[X][/math] of a Pareto distribution is [math]E[x]=\frac{\beta}{\alpha-1}[/math] and is defined whenever [math]\alpha\gt 1[/math].
Rather than calculating directly, let's make an observation. We have [math]f_{X_d}(x) = \frac{f_X(x+d)}{1-F_X(d)}=\frac{\alpha(d+\beta)^\alpha}{(x+d+\beta)^{\alpha+1}}[/math]. This is itself a Pareto distribution with parameters α, [math](d+\beta)[/math]. Consequently, we immediately get [math]E[X_d]=\frac{d+\beta}{\alpha-1}[/math]. Keeping an eye out for relations like this can save you a lot of time on the exam...

Excess Severity

Layer of Coverage

Excess Claim Counts

Aggregate Layer Claims

Pop Quiz Answers